The evil effects of a market economy that does not fully play its role are not only hazy, but only land pollution, water pollution, and human pollution cannot be seen.

Since the beginning of this year, serious haze pollution has generally occurred in Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shanxi, Shandong, and Henan, and the red warning has not arrived on time. It was recalled that some people said not long ago that Japan donated 500 million yuan to the Chinese government to allow China to plant trees so that the haze did not float to Japan. The news did not know whether it was true or false, but netizens commented that: 1. It is good to have 1 million for planting trees. 2 . 500 million you are also eager to get out of it? Our director's cash at home more than 200 million!3. The leaders were very touched and then divided the money with tears.

This is of course a joke, but the management of smog is none of the topics that everyone is most concerned about, especially people who live in this haze like me.

There are many comments on governance in various fields. One of the main arguments is that environmental protection and economic growth are antagonistic. However, careful research will reveal that environmental pollution and economic development are not simple causal relationships. Theoretically speaking, under the market economy, everything has corresponding transactions and prices, and it is precisely because some powers and responsibilities are not clear. The system has not played a role in fully allowing the market to function. The cost and responsibility of environmental pollution itself. People are missing. For example, the competitiveness of China's manufacturing industry has always been a cost advantage. It simply means that people are cheaper and resources are cheaper. This includes pollution to the environment. Driven by the expansion of the scale of manufacturing orders, the price of products is Does not include the cost of regulating and managing the pollution produced by the manufactured product. In other words, the manufacturer intentionally or unintentionally transferred this cost to all the people in this environment in exchange for low-cost production and high profits.

The market economy is not the cause of haze. The market economy is only on the surface, and not reaching the factor level is the cause of haze. From this point of view, we can learn that the means currently used to cure embarrassment are all boil down. The closure of factories and the driving of people with limited numbers are all blocked from the end of the whole chain of pollution, but not from the market. The angle makes the system and price play a role, the system determines who is polluting, and the price determines the price he pays.

In fact, the consequences of a market economy that has not fully played its role are not only hazy, but the pollution of land pollution, water pollution, and human nature cannot be seen. The root cause is that the entire high-speed development of the economic structure is pollution-based, highly polluting, The proportion of industries with high energy consumption is too high.

In fact, during these years of development, some of us have the opportunity to gradually revise this structure. However, the lack of a responsible mechanism has caused the consequences to be so severe today that we have to pay a huge price for it to be alleviated. . The structural transformation of the economy is painful. When the economic structure reaches danger, the sudden transition is even more painful. It is impossible to avoid corporate closures, laid-off workers, and economic downturns.

We are not abandoning the manufacturing industry. Instead, we must let the proportion, cost, and responsibility of the manufacturing industry return to normal levels. The government is duty-bound to control pollution and improve the environment. People are happy to do good, but they should not pay for pollution. . The situation and process of economic restructuring will also be an important opportunity for the allocation of residents' assets in the current era of low interest rates.

We should not blindly criticize and criticize. We should think about fundamental solutions that are more feasible under the current framework and advance their implementation within our capabilities. In contrast, a certain chicken soup lady believes that in the face of haze, we must “never go into competition, close the doors and windows, and open the air purifier. If this is useless, we must rely on our own mental protection to prevent smog from entering our hearts. This viewpoint is not only not nutritious, it is even a pollution in itself.

These days, when I was wearing gas masks, I did not need to. Instead, I marked an attitude, an appeal, and I did not drink this bowl of chicken soup because I was wearing a gas mask.